ABSTRACT
Emergency Remote Language Teaching is a new term coined after the concept of Emergency Remote Teaching (Hodges, et al., 2020), which emphasizes that teaching that is being done during emergencies and crises, as the pandemic caused by COVID-19, is neither distance nor online teaching properly. This paper explores the attitudes and perceptions of pre-service bilingual primary teachers at the University of Córdoba (Spain) regarding the design of socially and culturally responsive learning materials in a real Emergency Remote Language Teaching context. Due to the nature of this exploratory research, this study was designed to perform a qualitative analysis. To analyze the data, the grounded-theory scheme was followed to establish different categories and topics, then content analysis was applied, and finally, a manual SWOT analysis was created. Participants showed positive attitudes towards the design of materials for Emergency Remote Language Teaching, emphasizing the feeling of real teachers, the design of resources with a meaningful purpose, and the importance of 'thinking outside the box.' They also found challenges derived from the new, complex situation, and the lack of experience designing materials for distance teaching. Recommendations are proposed for teacher training and materials design in Emergency Remote Language Teaching contexts.
ABSTRACT
A la Histéresis, el Estancamiento Secular y el Límite Inferior Cero se les ha unido un cuarto jinete, la pandemia por Coronavirus. Si la desconexión de la tradicional Política de Tipo de Interés para la gestión macroeconómica forzó a los bancos centrales de todo el mundo a realizar incursiones en terreno inexplorado;el shock del COVID-19 obliga a adentrarse más en lo desconocido y hacerlo rápido, porque los costes de no hacerlo provocarán daños amplios y persistentes. En este contexto, discutimos el papel de la política fiscal y cómo ideas emergentes aparecidas en momentos históricos similares deben reconsiderarse Hysteresis, Secular Stagnation, and Zero Lower Bound have been joined by a fourth rider, the Coronavirus pandemic. If the disconnection from the traditional Interest Rate Policy for macroeconomic management forced central banks around the world to make incursions into unexplored terrain;the shock of COVID-19 forces us to delve deeper into the unknown and do it quickly, because the costs of not doing so will cause extensive and persistent damage. In this context, we discuss the role of fiscal policy and how emerging ideas appearing at similar historical moments should be reconsidered